Gewählte Publikation:
SHR
Neuro
Krebs
Kardio
Lipid
Stoffw
Microb
Sourij, H; Schmoelzer, I; de Campo, A; Tripolt, NJ; Stojakovic, T; Scharnagl, H; Kettler-Schmut, E; Forst, T; Wascher, TC.
Non-glycemic effects of insulin therapy: a comparison between insulin aspart and regular human insulin during two consecutive meals in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Eur J Endocrinol. 2011; 165(2): 269-274.
Doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0061
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
-
Sourij Harald
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
-
DeCampo Antonella
-
Kettler-Schmut Eva
-
Scharnagl Hubert
-
Stojakovic Tatjana
-
Tripolt Norbert
-
Wascher Thomas
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- Objective: To control postprandial hyperglycemia in insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients, prandial therapy with regular human insulin (HI) or fast acting insulin analogs is used. Postprandial hyperglycemia seems to be reduced more effectively with insulin analogs than with normal insulin, but there are no data concerning the effect on lipolysis or pancreatic insulin and proinsulin secretion of normal insulin in comparison to insulin analogs. Design and methods: We included 13 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (age 62.2 +/- 10.3 years) with preexisting insulin therapy in this crossover, prospective, open-labeled, randomized trial comparing regular HI with insulin aspart (IA) in the setting of a standardized breakfast and a standardized lunch 4 h later. Blood samples for determination of glucose, free fatty acids (FFA), triglycerides, C-peptide, and intact proinsulin were drawn during fasting and every 30 min until 4 h after the second test meal. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA for repeated measurements and paired Student's t-test. Results: The mean increase in blood glucose was significantly lower after IA (24.18 +/- 16.33 vs 34.92 +/- 29.07 mg/dl, P=0.02) compared with HI. Both therapies reduced FFA; however, the mean reduction was significantly higher after IA than after HI (-0.47 +/- 0.16 vs -0.35 +/- 0.15 mmol/l, P<0.001). The mean increase in intact proinsulin was significantly lower after IA than after HI (10.53 +/- 5 vs 15.20 +/- 6.83 pmol/l, P<0.001). No differences were observed in the C-peptide levels between the two groups. Conclusion: In the setting of two consecutive meals, IA reduces lipolysis and proinsulin secretion more effectively than HI.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
-
Aged -
-
Blood Glucose - drug effects
-
Cross-Over Studies -
-
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - blood Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy
-
Drug Administration Schedule -
-
Eating - drug effects Eating - physiology
-
Female -
-
Humans -
-
Hyperglycemia - blood Hyperglycemia - prevention and control
-
Hyperlipidemias - blood Hyperlipidemias - metabolism
-
Insulin - administration and dosage Insulin - analogs and derivatives Insulin - pharmacology
-
Male -
-
Middle Aged -
-
Postprandial Period - drug effects
-
Time Factors -