Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Go directly to the nagivation.
Go directly to the content.

Navigation/Search

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Hirtsiefer, C; Vogelgesang, A; Falkenbach, F; Kafka, M; Uhlig, A; Nestler, T; Aksoy, C; Simunovic, I; Huber, J; Heidegger, I; Graefen, M; Leitsmann, M; Thomas, C; Baunacke, M.
Information Behaviour and Knowledge of Patients Before Radical Prostatectomy
CANCERS. 2025; 17(2): 300 Doi: 10.3390/cancers17020300 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

Co-authors Med Uni Graz: Leitsmann Marianne; Simunovic Iva
Altmetrics:
Dimensions Citations:
Plum Analytics:
Scite (citation analytics):
Abstract:: Background/Objectives: Robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy (RARP and ORP) are established procedures for localized prostate cancer, with comparable oncological and functional outcomes. Little is known about patients' knowledge of both procedures. This study aimed to examine comparatively the informational behaviour and knowledge of patients undergoing ORP vs. RARP. Methods: This prospective, multicentre study included patients who underwent RARP or ORP prior to presurgery counselling. The questionnaires gathered information about patients' information-seeking behaviours and their assessment of outcomes for RARP vs. ORP. We investigated risk factors for the misperception of procedure outcomes. Results: A total of 508 patients were included (307 RARP (60%); 201 ORP (40%)). The most common sources of information were outpatient urologists (84%), urologic departments (67%) and the internet (57%). Compared with ORP, RARP patients more often received the same amount of information about both procedures (60% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). Compared with ORP, RARP patients wrongfully considered their procedure to be superior in terms of oncological and functional outcomes. In the multivariable analysis, age > 66 years (OR 2.1, p = 0.02), no high school degree (OR 1.9, p = 0.04), unbalanced information search (OR 2.4, p = 0.02), RARP patient status (OR 8.9, p < 0.001), and treatment at a centre offering only one procedure (OR 3.5, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of misperception. Conclusions: RARP patients wrongfully considered their intervention to be oncologically and functionally more beneficial than ORP patients perceived it to be. This may be due to unbalanced sources of information. Urologists and surgical centres must address this misperception to enable patients to make informed decisions.
Find related publications in this database (Keywords): radical prostatectomy; robot-assisted surgery; patient decision-making; informational behaviour; prostate cancer treatment; RARP; ORP