Gewählte Publikation:
SHR
Neuro
Krebs
Kardio
Lipid
Stoffw
Microb
Kittner, T; Rudolf, J; Fages, JF; Legmann, P; Aschauer, M; Repa, I; Alvares, MR; Savalegui, I; Ittrich, H; Geterud, K; de Kevviler, E; Ayuso, J; Lockhart, ME; Blum, A; Iliasch, H; Leisinger, G; van Beek, EJ; Reid, AW; Brown, JJ; Yu, TC; Flamm, SD; Düber, C; Judmaier, W; Reimer, P; Stiskal, M; Kramann, B; Wolff, S; Blankenstein, C.
Efficacy and safety of gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA) in renal 3D-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): a phase II study.
Eur J Radiol. 2007; 64(3): 456-464.
Doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.034
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
-
Aschauer Manuela
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- PURPOSE: To determine the most efficacious dose of gadodiamide for three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the renal arteries on a patient level based on the sensitivity in detecting the main hemodynamically relevant (> or =50% or occlusion) renal artery stenosis (RAS) using intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA) as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study included 273 patients referred to IA DSA for suspected RAS. Patients underwent 3D CE MRA after injection of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2mmol/kg of body weight gadodiamide (0.5mmol/ml). The images were assessed for location and degree of RAS by independent blinded readers (MRA: three readers, IA DSA: one reader). Hypothesis testing for a significant trend in sensitivity across dose groups was based on the one-sided Cochran-Armitage style trend test for each independent MRA reader. RESULTS: The lowest dose group (0.01mmol/kg) proved non-efficacious in detecting hemodynamically relevant (i.e., > or =50% or occlusion) RAS. A statistically significant dose trend (p<0.001) was shown for each of the three independent readers. Depending on reader, the sensitivity obtained with 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2mmol/kg was 63.9-86.1%, 75.8-91.4% and 80.6-90.6%, the specificity was 66.7-73.9%, 59.3-75.0%, and 59.3-75.0% and accuracy was 67.8-78.9%, 75.4-77.4%, and 76.3-81.0%, for the three dose groups, respectively. There were eight non-severe adverse events (AEs). Three serious AEs occurring in one patient were judged not related to gadodiamide by the on-site investigator. CONCLUSION: A significant dose trend between the four doses examined was observed. The lowest dose (0.01mmol/kg) differed significantly from those of the other three doses. Based on the analysis of the primary and secondary endpoints, 0.1mmol/kg gadodiamide appears to be the most suitable dose in diagnosing hemodynamically relevant RAS. The present study also demonstrated gadodiamide to be safe and well tolerated.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
-
Adult -
-
Aged -
-
Aged, 80 and over -
-
Angiography, Digital Subtraction -
-
Contrast Media - administration and dosage
-
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug - administration and dosage
-
Double-Blind Method - administration and dosage
-
Female - administration and dosage
-
Gadolinium DTPA - administration and dosage
-
Humans - administration and dosage
-
Image Enhancement - methods
-
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
-
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
-
Injections, Intravenous - methods
-
Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods
-
Male - methods
-
Middle Aged - methods
-
Prospective Studies - methods
-
Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnosis
-
Safety - diagnosis
-
Sensitivity and Specificity - diagnosis
-
Treatment Outcome - diagnosis
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
-
renal artery stenosis
-
angiography
-
magnetic resonance imaging
-
digital subtraction angiography
-
intra-arterial
-
Gd-DTPA-BMA
-
clinical trials
-
phase II