Gewählte Publikation:
Weghaupt, H; Menapace, R; Wedrich, A.
Functional vision with hydrogel versus PMMA lens implants.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993; 231(8):449-452
Doi: 10.1007/BF02044230
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
-
Wedrich Andreas
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- As a particular test of visual function, contrast sensitivity reveals optical properties of Iogel pHema lenses in comparison to poly(methyl methacrylate) implants (PMMA). Sixteen patients with a hydrogel posterior chamber lens in one eye and a PMMA posterior chamber lens in the other were examined by means of contrast sensitivity measurements. Six stationary, vertical, sinusoidal modulated gratings with spatial frequencies of 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 11.4 and 22.8 cycles/degree were presented. Results of the two different implants were analyzed by a paired t-test. There was no significant statistical difference between the two types of lenses for any of the gratings presented. Despite different features like material, refractive index, design and UV-absorbing additive, there seems to be no difference between lenses made of hydrogel and those made of PMMA material with regard to functional vision as evaluated by contrast sensitivity testing.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
-
Aged -
-
Cataract Extraction -
-
Comparative Study -
-
Contrast Sensitivity - physiology
-
Humans - physiology
-
Hydrogel - physiology
-
Lenses, Intraocular - physiology
-
Methylmethacrylate - physiology
-
Methylmethacrylates - physiology
-
Polyethylene Glycols - physiology
-
Visual Acuity - physiology