Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Gutmann, A; Pessenbacher, K; Gschanes, A; Eggenreich, U; Wargenau, M; Toller, W.
Propofol anesthesia in spontaneously breathing children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of two propofol emulsions.
PEDIATR ANESTH. 2006; 16(3): 266-274. Doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01777.x
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Leading authors Med Uni Graz
Gutmann Anton
Co-authors Med Uni Graz
Toller Wolfgang
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated a propofol-based anesthesia regimen with spontaneous breathing in pediatric patients scheduled for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study propofol formulated with long-chain triglycerides (LCT) and mixed medium-chain/long-chain triglycerides (MCT/LCT) were used. Ninety patients aged 2.4 months to 7.3 years were premedicated with intravenous midazolam. Lidocaine was injected prior to propofol to reduce injection pain. Anesthesia was induced and maintained by propofol. Glycopyrronium bromide was administered for saliva reduction. Hemodynamics, blood oxygen saturation and endtidal capnography were continuously monitored. All patients received additional oxygen. The aggregated propofol dose for induction and maintenance of anesthesia was analyzed for therapeutic equivalence. Incidence of injection pain, laboratory safety values, vital signs, and the adverse event profile were analyzed to compare tolerability and safety. RESULTS: Propofol anesthesia was safe and successful in all children. Both propofol formulations were equivalent regarding dose requirements (mean induction and maintenance doses for anesthesia 2.0-4.0 mg.kg(-1) and 6.0-8.8 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) respectively; aggregated doses 8-13.26 mg.kg(-1)). There were no differences in drug safety such as hemodynamics, spontaneous breathing, injection pain, and laboratory values. Duration of induction and of recovery from anesthesia were short and all examinations were completed with minimal interruption. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol-based short-term anesthesia was well suited for anesthesia during MRI procedures in the studied pediatric patients. There were no clinically relevant differences between the two propofol formulations.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Anesthesia, Intravenous -
Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects
Child - adverse effects
Child, Preschool - adverse effects
Dosage Forms - adverse effects
Double-Blind Method - adverse effects
Emulsions - adverse effects
Female - adverse effects
Humans - adverse effects
Infant - adverse effects
Injections, Intravenous - adverse effects
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects
Male - adverse effects
Propofol - adverse effects
Therapeutic Equivalency - adverse effects
Triglycerides - adverse effects

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
anesthesia
propofol
anesthetics
intravenous propofol
propofol
administration and dosage
therapeutic use
adverse effects
hypotension
chemically induced
magnetic resonance imaging
© Med Uni GrazImprint