Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

Kortmann, RD; Kühl, J; Timmermann, B; Mittler, U; Urban, C; Budach, V; Richter, E; Willich, N; Flentje, M; Berthold, F; Slavc, I; Wolff, J; Meisner, C; Wiestler, O; Sörensen, N; Warmuth-Metz, M; Bamberg, M.
Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood: results of the German prospective randomized trial HIT '91.
INT J RADIAT ONCOL BIOL PHYS. 2000; 46(2): 269-279. Doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00369-7
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG Google Scholar

 

Co-authors Med Uni Graz
Urban Ernst-Christian
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
PURPOSE: The German Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (GPOH) conducted a randomized, prospective, multicenter trial (HIT '91) in order to improve the survival of children with medulloblastoma by using postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiation therapy as opposed to maintenance chemotherapy after immediate postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1991 and 1997, 158 patients were enrolled and 137 patients randomized. Seventy-two patients were allocated to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy (arm I, investigational). Chemotherapy consisted of ifosfamide, etoposide, intravenous high-dose methotrexate, cisplatin, and cytarabine given in two cycles. In arm II (standard arm), 65 patients were assigned to receive immediate postoperative radiotherapy, with concomitant vincristine followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin, CCNU, and vincristine ("Philadelphia protocol"). All patients received radiotherapy to the craniospinal axis (35.2 Gy total dose, 1.6 Gy fractionated dose / 5 times per week followed by a boost to posterior fossa with 20 Gy, 2.0 Gy fractionated dose). RESULTS: During chemotherapy Grade III/IV infections were predominant in arm I (40%). Peripheral neuropathy and ototoxicity were prevailing in arm II (37% and 34%, respectively). Dose modification was necessary in particular in arm II (63%). During radiotherapy acute toxicity was mild in the majority of patients and equally distributed in both arms. Myelosuppression led to a mean prolongation of treatment time of 11.5 days in arm I and 7.5 days in arm II, and interruptions in 35% of patients in arm I. Quality control of radiotherapy revealed correct treatment in more than 88% for dose prescription, more than 88% for coverage of target volume, and 98% for field matching. At a median follow-up of 30 months (range 1.4-62 months), the Kaplan-Meier estimates for relapse-free survival at 3 years for all randomized patients were 0.70+/-0.08; for patients with residual disease: 0.72+/-0.06; without residual disease: 0.68+/-0.09; M0: 0.72+/-0.04; M1: 0.65+/-0.12; and M2/3: 0.30+/-0.15. For all randomized patients without M2/3 disease: 0.65+/-0.05 (arm I) and 0.78+/-0.06 (arm II) (p < 0.03); patients between 3 and 5.9 years: 0.60+/-0.13 and 0.64+/-0.14, respectively, but patients between 6 and 18 years: 0.62+/-0.09 and 0.84+/-0.08, respectively (p < 0.03). In a univariate analysis the only negative prognostic factors were M2/3 disease (p < 0.002) and an age of less than 8 years (p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance chemotherapy would seem to be more effective in low-risk medulloblastoma, especially in patients older than 6 years of age. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was accompanied by increased myelotoxicity of the subsequent radiotherapy, causing a higher rate of interruptions and an extended overall treatment time. Delayed and/or protracted radiotherapy may therefore have a negative impact on outcome. M2/3 disease was associated with a poor survival in both arms, suggesting the need for a more intensive treatment. Young age and M2/3 stage were negative prognostic factors in medulloblastoma, but residual or M1 disease was not, suggesting a new stratification system for risk subgroups. High quality of radiotherapy may be a major contributing factor for the overall outcome.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Adolescent -
Analysis of Variance -
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Bone Marrow Cells - drug effects
Cerebellar Neoplasms - drug therapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - drug therapy
Child - drug therapy
Child, Preschool - drug therapy
Disease Progression - drug therapy
Drug Administration Schedule - drug therapy
Female - drug therapy
Germany - drug therapy
Humans - drug therapy
Male - drug therapy
Medulloblastoma - drug therapy
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy
Prospective Studies - drug therapy
Radiation Injuries - complications
Radiotherapy Dosage - complications
Survival Analysis - complications

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
medulloblastoma
radiotherapy
chemotherapy
quality assurance
© Med Uni GrazImprint