Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Cindolo, L; Patard, JJ; Chiodini, P; Schips, L; Ficarra, V; Tostain, J; de La Taille, A; Altieri, V; Lobel, B; Zigeuner, RE; Artibani, W; Guillé, F; Abbou, CC; Salzano, L; Gallo, C.
Comparison of predictive accuracy of four prognostic models for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a multicenter European study.
CANCER. 2005; 104: 1362-1371. Doi: 10.1002/cncr.21331 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG Google Scholar

 

Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Schips Luigi
Zigeuner Richard
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to compare, in a large multicenter study, the discriminating accuracy of four prognostic models developed to predict the survival of patients undergoing nephrectomy for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: A total of 2404 records of patients from 6 European centers were retrospectively reviewed. For each patient, prognostic scores were calculated according to four models: the Kattan model, the University of California at Los Angeles integrated staging system (UISS) model, the Yaycioglu model, and the Cindolo model. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Discriminating ability was assessed by the Harrell c-index for censored data. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: At last follow-up, 541 subjects had died of any causes, with a 5-year OS rate of 80%. The 5-year CSS and RFS rates were 85% and 78%, respectively. All models discriminated well (P < 0.0001). The c-indexes for OS were 0.706 for the Kattan nomogram, 0.683 for the UISS model, and 0.589 and 0.615 for the Yaycioglu and Cindolo models, respectively. The Kattan nomogram was found to improve discrimination substantially in the UISS intermediate-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: The current study appears to better define the general applicability of prognostic models for predicting survival in patients with nonmetastatic RCC treated with nephrectomy. The results suggest that postoperative models discriminate substantially better than preoperative ones. The Kattan model was consistently found to be the most accurate, although the UISS model was only slightly less well performing. The Kattan model can be useful in the UISS intermediate-risk patients.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Adolescent -
Adult -
Age Factors -
Aged -
Aged, 80 and over -
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality
Cause of Death - mortality
Child - mortality
Comparative Study - mortality
Europe - epidemiology
Female - epidemiology
Humans - epidemiology
Incidence - epidemiology
Kidney Neoplasms - mortality
Male - mortality
Middle Aged - mortality
Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology
Neoplasm Staging - methods
Nephrectomy - methods
Predictive Value of Tests - methods
Prognosis - methods
Proportional Hazards Models - methods
ROC Curve - methods
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't - methods
Retrospective Studies - methods
Risk Assessment - methods
Sensitivity and Specificity - methods
Sex Factors - methods
Statistics, Nonparametric - methods
Survival Rate - methods
Treatment Outcome - methods

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
renal cell carcinoma
prognosis
validation
prognostic models
© Med Uni Graz Impressum