Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Toplak, H; Ziegler, O; Keller, U; Hamann, A; Godin, C; Wittert, G; Zanella, MT; Zuniga-Guajardo, S; Van Gaal, L.
X-PERT: weight reduction with orlistat in obese subjects receiving a mildly or moderately reduced-energy diet: early response to treatment predicts weight maintenance.
DIABETES OBES METAB. 2005; 7(6): 699-708. Doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2005.00483.x
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Toplak Hermann
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
AIM: To determine the effect of two different levels of energy deficit on weight loss in obese patients treated with orlistat. METHODS: Patients (n=430) were randomized in a 1-year, multicentre, open-label, parallel group study conducted at 23 hospital centres and university medical departments worldwide. Obese outpatients (body mass index 30--43 kg/m(2)) aged 18--70 years with a body weight of >or=90 kg and a waist circumference of >or=88 cm (women) or >or=102 cm (men) were treated with orlistat 120 mg three times daily plus a diet that provided an energy deficit of either 500 or 1,000 kcal/day for 1 year. Orlistat treatment was discontinued in patients who did not achieve >or=5% weight loss after assessment at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome measure was change in body weight from baseline at week 52. RESULTS: Reported mean difference in energy intake between the two groups (500-1,000 kcal/day deficit) at weeks 24 and 52 was actually 111 and 95 kcal/day respectively. Of the 430 patients involved in the study, 295 achieved >or=5% weight loss at both 3 and 6 months. In this population, at week 52, weight loss from baseline was similar for patients randomized to either the 500 or the 1,000 kcal/day deficit diet (-11.4 kg vs. -11.8 kg, respectively; p=0.778). After 12 months of treatment with orlistat, 84% (n=118/141) and 85% (n=131/154) of patients in the 500 and 1,000 kcal/day deficit groups, respectively, achieved >or=5% weight loss, and 50% (n=70/141) and 53% (n=82/154) of patients, respectively, achieved >or=10% weight loss. Patients in both the diet treatment groups showed similar significant improvements in blood pressure, lipid levels and waist circumference at week 52. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with orlistat was associated with a clinically beneficial weight loss, irrespective of the prescribed dietary energy restriction (-500 or -1000 kcal/day). Patients who achieved >or=5% weight loss at 3 months achieved long-term, clinically beneficial weight loss with orlistat plus either diet. Therefore, identifying patients who lose at least 5% weight after 3 months and who maintain this weight loss up to 6 months is a valuable treatment algorithm to select patients who will benefit most from orlistat treatment in combination with diet.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Adolescent -
Adult -
Aged -
Anthropometry -
Anti-Obesity Agents - adverse effects
Body Weight - adverse effects
Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology
Combined Modality Therapy - etiology
Diet, Reducing - etiology
Energy Intake - etiology
Female - etiology
Humans - etiology
Lactones - adverse effects
Male - adverse effects
Middle Aged - adverse effects
Obesity - complications
Patient Compliance - complications
Risk Factors - complications
Treatment Outcome - complications
Weight Loss - drug effects

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
diet
obese
orlistat
weight loss
© Med Uni Graz Impressum