Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

von, der, Linden, J; Vlachea, P; Kolos, O; Herrmann, F; Belyaev, S; Juchem, G; Peterss, S; Hagl, C; Dashkevich, A.
Promising early outcomes in surgical aortic valve replacement utilizing the rapid deployment approach for isolated aortic valve regurgitation.
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025; 40(7): Doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf147 [OPEN ACCESS]
PubMed PUBMED Central FullText FullText_MUG

 

Leading authors Med Uni Graz
von der Linden Julia
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Surgical aortic valve implantation remains the therapeutic gold standard for aortic valve regurgitation. Due to annular dilatation and lack of calcification, transcatheter aortic valve replacement is not recommended. Although rapid deployment valves allow faster implantation and excellent haemodynamics, they are currently not recommended for patients with aortic valve regurgitation. This study retrospectively analysed the use of rapid deployment prostheses in patients with pure aortic valve regurgitation. METHODS: From 2014 to 2022, 444 rapid deployment valves were implanted. Since 2017 until 2022, 22 were used for patients with pure aortic valve regurgitation. This cohort was compared to 77 patients who had undergone rapid deployment valve implantation for pure aortic stenosis during the same time period. Both cohorts were analysed for major clinical outcomes, including pacemaker implantation, mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and the need for redo surgery. RESULTS: In both groups, no valve intraoperative and postoperative valve revisions were required. Transvalvular gradients were comparable between the groups (ΔPmean/max 7.1/13.3 mmHg in the aortic valve regurgitation and 7.9/14.7 mmHg in the AS cohort), and there were no paravalvular leaks. The postoperative pacemaker implantation rate was 0% for the rapid deployment group and 1.3% for the conventional valve replacement group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that rapid deployment valves can be safely applied for the treatment of patients with aortic valve regurgitation, even in the absence of calcification. This expands the surgeon's armamentarium and can be especially useful in patients requiring extensive surgery where saving aortic cross-clamp time may be especially beneficial.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Humans - administration & dosage
Male - administration & dosage
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery, physiopathology, diagnostic imaging, mortality
Female - administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies - administration & dosage
Aged - administration & dosage
Aortic Valve - surgery, physiopathology, diagnostic imaging
Heart Valve Prosthesis - administration & dosage
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects, instrumentation, mortality, methods
Aged, 80 and over - administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome - administration & dosage
Time Factors - administration & dosage
Postoperative Complications - therapy, mortality
Prosthesis Design - administration & dosage
Hemodynamics - administration & dosage
Risk Factors - administration & dosage

© Med Uni GrazImprint