Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Frank, K; Koban, K; Targosinski, S; Erlbacher, K; Schenck, TL; Casabona, G; Braz, AV; Pavicic, T; Cotofana, S.
The Anatomy behind Adverse Events in Hand Volumizing Procedures: Retrospective Evaluations of 11 Years of Experience.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141(5): 650e-662e. Doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004211
PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Erlbacher Katharina
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: To retrospectively evaluate the rate of adverse events after hand volumizing procedures using a calcium hydroxylapatite product and to investigate the relationship between injector used (i.e., needle versus cannula) and technique applied (i.e., bolus, tenting, proximal-to-distal fanning, distal-to-proximal single line). METHODS: Two hundred twenty individuals, including 214 women (97.3 percent) aged 52.3 ± 11.4 years, treated bilaterally for hand rejuvenation were investigated between the years 2006 and 2017. Cadaveric dissections (n = 12), fluoroscopic (n = 4), ultrasound (n = 22), and computed tomographic (n = 4) imaging were also performed to guide conclusions. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 440 hands (7.3 percent) developed adverse events within the first 15 days, with swelling in 11 (5 percent), pain in four (1.8 percent), erythema in three (1.4 percent), and discoloration in one (0.5 percent). Using a needle (versus a cannula) was significantly related to the occurrence of adverse events (OR, 7.57; 95 percent CI, 3.76 to 15.24; p < 0.001). The proximal-to-distal fanning technique with access to the dorsal superficial lamina was identified as a safer application technique, with each of the other techniques having a significantly increased odds ratio for adverse events: bolus technique (OR, 26.9; 95 percent CI, 6.87 to 105.2; p < 0.001), tenting technique (OR, 24.73; 95 percent CI, 7.48 to 81.76; p < 0.001), and single-line technique (OR, 26.68; 95 percent CI, 7.45 to 95.48; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the use of cannula versus needle and the proximal-to-distal fanning technique. The underlying anatomy supports the positioning of the material into the subdermal space, which can be identified less than 1 mm deep to the skin surface, and is termed the dorsal superficial lamina.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Adult - administration & dosage
Aged - administration & dosage
Aged, 80 and over - administration & dosage
Cannula - adverse effects
Cosmetic Techniques - adverse effects, instrumentation
Dermal Fillers - administration & dosage, adverse effects
Durapatite - administration & dosage, adverse effects
Female - administration & dosage
Hand - anatomy & histology, diagnostic imaging, surgery
Humans - administration & dosage
Injection Site Reaction - epidemiology, etiology
Injections, Subcutaneous - adverse effects, instrumentation
Male - administration & dosage
Middle Aged - administration & dosage
Needles - adverse effects
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology, etiology
Rejuvenation - administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies - administration & dosage
Skin Aging - administration & dosage
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - administration & dosage

© Med Uni Graz Impressum