Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal
Selected Publication:
SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb
Alexander, E; Katharina, T; Verena, F; Jürgen, G; Maximilian, N; Calvin, K; Andreas, S; Wolfgang, S; Harald, H; Dominik, R.
Comparison of different mechanical chest compression devices in the alpine rescue setting: a randomized triple crossover experiment.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021; 29(1): 84
Doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00899-x
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-authors Med Uni Graz
- Niederer Maximilian
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in mountain environment is challenging. Continuous chest compressions during transport or hoist rescue are almost impossible without mechanical chest compression devices. Current evidence is predominantly based on studies conducted by urbane ambulance service. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of continuous mechanical chest compression during alpine terrestrial transport using three different devices. METHODS: Randomized triple crossover prospective study in an alpine environment. Nineteen teams of the Austrian Mountain Rescue Service trained according to current ERC guidelines performed three runs each of a standardised alpine rescue-scenario, using three different devices for mechanical chest compression. Quality of CPR, hands-off-time and displacement of devices were measured. RESULTS: The primary outcome of performed work (defined as number of chest compressions x compression depth) was 66,062 mm (2832) with Corpuls CPR, 65,877 mm (6163) with Physio-Control LUCAS 3 and 40,177 mm (4396) with Schiller Easy Pulse. The difference both between LUCAS 3 and Easy Pulse (Δ 25,700; 95% confidence interval 21,118 - 30,282) and between Corpuls CPR and Easy Pulse (Δ 25,885; 23,590 - 28,181) was significant. No relevant differences were found regarding secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Mechanical chest compression devices provide a viable option in the alpine setting. For two out of three devices (Corpuls CPR and LUCAS 3) we found adequate quality of CPR. Those devices also maintained a correct placement of the piston even during challenging terrestrial transport. Adequate hands-off-times and correct placement could be achieved even by less trained personnel.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
- Adult - administration & dosage
- Ambulances - administration & dosage
- Austria - administration & dosage
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - instrumentation
- Cross-Over Studies - administration & dosage
- Equipment Design - administration & dosage
- Female - administration & dosage
- Humans - administration & dosage
- Male - administration & dosage
- Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy
- Pressure - administration & dosage
- Prospective Studies - administration & dosage
- Thorax - administration & dosage
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
- Mechanical chest compression
- Alpine rescue mission
- Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
- Hypothermic cardiac arrest