Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz
Gewählte Publikation:
SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb
Kling, M; Haeussl, A; Dalkner, N; Fellendorf, FT; Lenger, M; Finner, A; Ilic, J; Smolak, IS; Stojec, L; Zwigl, I; Reininghaus, EZ.
Social robots in adult psychiatry: a summary of utilisation and impact.
Front Psychiatry. 2025; 16:1506776
Doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1506776
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
- Häussl Alfred Alois
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
- Dalkner Nina
- Fellendorf Frederike
- Finner Alexander
- Ilic Julia
- Lenger Melanie
- Reininghaus Eva
- Smolak Irina Silke
- Zwigl Ina
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- UNLABELLED: Social robots are increasingly becoming more prevalent in healthcare, including nursing, geriatric care, and treatment for children on the autism spectrum. Their assistance is believed to hold promise in mitigating the effects of staffing shortages and enhancing current mental health treatment. Nevertheless, the application of social robotics in psychiatry remains restricted and controversial. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the literature on social robots in adult psychiatry concerning their use, effects, and acceptability. We conducted a literature search, including PubMed and PsycINFO, to identify literature on robot interventions for adult psychiatric patients. Methodological quality was assessed using the 'Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool'. Usage and target variables were unique to every included original study (N = 7) and suggested a wide range of possible implications for patient treatment and care. Social robots were used to reduce symptoms, improve functioning, and gain insights into characteristic features of specific mental health conditions. The included studies were concerned with the following diagnoses: schizophrenia (N = 3), autism spectrum disorder (N = 2), and intellectual disability (N = 2). The sample sizes were too small to generalise the outcome, but overall trends showed some positive effects on the selected symptoms. Observations and participant feedback suggested high acceptance and enjoyment of the users. Although the evidence regarding the benefits of robotic interventions in adult psychiatry is still low, it suffices to assume that investing in larger, randomised, and controlled trials is worthwhile and promising. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: asprediced.org, identifier 128766.
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
- social robot
- mental health
- schizophrenia
- autism spectrum disorder
- intellectual disability
- digital health