Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Milger, K; Skowasch, D; Hamelmann, E; Mümmler, C; Idzko, M; Gappa, M; Jandl, M; Körner-Rettberg, C; Ehmann, R; Schmidt, O; Taube, C; Holtdirk, A; Timmermann, H; Buhl, R; Korn, S.
Bronchodilator Reversibility in the GAN Severe Asthma Cohort.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023; 33(6):446-456 Doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0850
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Milger-Kneidinger Katrin
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Positive bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) is a diagnostic criterion for asthma. However, patients with asthma may exhibit a negative BDR response. Aim: To describe the frequency of positive and Negative BDR response in patients with severe asthma and study associations with phenotypic characteristics. METHODS: A positive BDR response was defined as an increase in FEV1 >200 mL and >12% upon testing with a short-acting ß-agonist. RESULTS: BDR data were available for 793 of the 2013 patients included in the German Asthma Net (GAN) severe asthma registry. Of these, 250 (31.5%) had a positive BDR response and 543 (68.5%) a egative BDR response. Comorbidities significantly associated with a negative response were gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (28.0% vs 40.0%, P<.01) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (0.4% vs 3.0%; P<.05), while smoking history (active: 2.8% vs 2.2%; ex: 40.0% vs 41.7%) and comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (5.2% vs 7.2%) were similar in both groups. Patients with a positive BDR response had worse asthma control (median Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 score, 3.4 vs 3.0, P<.05), more frequently reported dyspnea at rest (26.8% vs 16.4%, P<.001) and chest tightness (36.4% vs 26.2%, P<.001), and had more severe airway obstruction at baseline (FEV1% predicted, 56 vs 64, P<.001) and higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels (41 vs 33 ppb, P<0.05). There were no differences in diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, single breath (% pred, 70% vs 71%). Multivariate linear regression analysis identified an association between positive BDR response and lower baseline FEV1% (P<.001) and chest tightness (P<.05) and a negative association between BDR and GERD (P<.05). CONCLUSION: In this real-life setting, most patients with severe asthma had a negative BDR response. Interestingly, this was not associated with smoking history or COPD, but with lower FeNO and presence of GERD.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Humans - administration & dosage
Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use
Churg-Strauss Syndrome - administration & dosage
Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology
Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis - administration & dosage
Asthma - diagnosis, drug therapy, epidemiology
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - drug therapy
Gastroesophageal Reflux - administration & dosage

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
Bronchodilator responsiveness
Severe asthma
Real-life cohort
GERD
FeNO
© Med Uni Graz Impressum