Gewählte Publikation:
SHR
Neuro
Krebs
Kardio
Lipid
Stoffw
Microb
Walter, E; Traunfellner, M; Meyer, F; Enzinger, C; Guger, M; Bsteh, C; Altmann, P; Hegen, H; Goger, C; Mikl, V.
Cost-effectiveness of the Floodlight® MS app in Austria. Unlocking the mystery of costs and outcomes of a digital health application for patients with multiple sclerosis.
Digit Health. 2025; 11:20552076251314550
Doi: 10.1177/20552076251314550
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
-
Enzinger Christian
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease affecting 2.9 million people worldwide, often leading to permanent disability. MS patients frequently use eHealth tools due to their relatively young age. The Floodlight® MS app is a scientifically designed smartphone application that helps patients monitor hand motor skills, walking ability and cognition between medical appointments. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of using the Floodlight® MS app alongside standard-of-care (SoC) versus SoC alone in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) from the perspective of the healthcare system. METHODS: A 10-year decision-analytic model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of incorporating the Floodlight® MS app alongside SoC. The analysis included treatment-naive individuals and those already on drug therapy, modelling the app's role in early detection of disease progression and relapses to improve quality-of-life. RESULTS: For treatment-naive patients, using the Floodlight® MS app resulted in a 2,660 € increase in total costs but yielded potential medical-cost savings of 786 € through health improvements. These patients experienced fewer relapses and slower disability progression, translating to a quality-of-life improvement of 4.5 months in perfect health and an incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratio (ICER) of 7,071 €. Pre-treated patients showed similar trends, with medical-cost savings of 718 €, an ICER of 7,864 €, and a quality-of-life improvement of 4.2 months. Higher effectiveness (+5%) led to an additional 8.3 months in perfect health and a reduction in overall costs. CONCLUSION: The analysis demonstrates that the Floodlight® MS app is a cost-effective digital health application, encouraging broader discussions on maximizing the potential of software-as-medical-devices within the care pathway.
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
-
Cost-effectiveness
-
cost-utility
-
multiple sclerosis
-
digital health application
-
Floodlight (R) MS