Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Lindroth, H; Liu, K; Szalacha, L; Ashkenazy, S; Bellelli, G; van, den, Boogaard, M; Caplan, G; Chung, CR; Elhadi, M; Gurjar, M; Heras-La-Calle, G; Hoffman, M; Jeitziner, MM; Krewulak, K; Mailhot, T; Morandi, A; Nawa, RK; Oh, ES; Collet, MO; Paulino, MC; von, Haken, R; Nydahl, P, , WDAD, Study, Team.
World delirium awareness and quality survey in 2023-a worldwide point prevalence study.
Age Ageing. 2024; 53(11): afae248 Doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae248 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed PUBMED Central FullText FullText_MUG

 

Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Hoffmann Magdalena
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Delirium, an acute brain dysfunction, is proposed to be highly prevalent in clinical care and shown to significantly increase the risk of mortality and dementia. OBJECTIVES: To report on the global prevalence of clinically documented delirium and delirium-related clinical practices in wards caring for paediatric and adult patients in healthcare facilities. DESIGN: A prospective, cross-sectional, 39-question survey completed on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians or researchers with access to clinical data. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The primary outcome was the prevalence of clinically documented delirium at 8:00 a.m. (4 h) and 8:00 p.m. (±4 h). Secondary outcomes included delirium-related care practices and barriers to use. Descriptive statistics were calculated and multilevel modelling was completed. RESULTS: 1664 wards submitted surveys from 44 countries, reporting on delirium assessments at 8:00 a.m. (n = 36 048) and 8:00 p.m. (n = 32 867); 61% reported use of validated delirium assessment tools. At 8:00 a.m., 18% (n = 2788/15 458) and at 8:00 p.m., 17.7% (n = 2454/13 860) were delirium positive. Top prevention measures were pain management (86.7%), mobilisation (81.4%) and adequate fluids (80.4%). Frequently reported pharmacologic interventions were benzodiazepines (52.7%) and haloperidol (46.2%). Top barriers included the shortage of staff (54.3%), lack of time to educate staff (48.6%) and missing knowledge about delirium (38%). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In this study, approximately one out of five patients were reported as delirious. The reported high use of benzodiazepines needs further evaluation as it is not aligned with best-practice recommendations. Findings provide a benchmark for future quality improvement projects and research.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Humans - administration & dosage
Delirium - epidemiology, diagnosis
Prevalence - administration & dosage
Cross-Sectional Studies - administration & dosage
Prospective Studies - administration & dosage
Global Health - administration & dosage
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice - administration & dosage
Adult - administration & dosage
Male - administration & dosage
Female - administration & dosage
Health Care Surveys - administration & dosage
Aged - administration & dosage
Surveys and Questionnaires - administration & dosage

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
global delirium prevalence
standard of practice
delivery of health care
cross-sectional studies
older people
© Med Uni Graz Impressum