Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Kraler, S; Liberale, L; Nopp, S; Englisch, C; Grilz, E; Lapikova-Bryhinska, T; Akhmedov, A; Carbone, F; Ramoni, D; Tirandi, A; Scuricini, A; Isoppo, S; Tortorella, C; La, Rosa, F; Michelauz, C; Frè, F; Gavoci, A; Lisa, A; Suter, TM; von, Eckardstein, A; Wenzl, FA; Pabinger, I; Lüscher, TF; Montecucco, F; Ay, C; Moik, F.
Biomarker-enhanced cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study.
J Thromb Haemost. 2024; 22(11):3125-3136 Doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.07.019
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Leading authors Med Uni Graz
Kraler Simon
Co-authors Med Uni Graz
Moik Florian
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Continuously improving cancer-specific survival puts a growing proportion of cancer patients at risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but tailored tools for cardiovascular risk prediction remain unavailable. OBJECTIVES: To assess a broad panel of cardiovascular biomarkers and risk factors for the prediction of MACE and cardiovascular death in cancer patients. METHODS: In total, 2192 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent cancer were followed prospectively for the occurrence of 2-year MACE and 5-year cardiovascular death. Univariable and multivariable risk models were fit to assess independent associations of cardiovascular risk factors and biomarkers with adverse outcomes, and a risk score was developed. RESULTS: Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and selected cancer types were linked to higher MACE risk. While levels of Lp(a), CRP, and GDF-15 did not associate with MACE, levels of ICAM-1, P-/E-/L-selectins, and NT-proBNP were independently linked to 2-year MACE risk. A clinical risk score was derived, assigning +1 point for male sex, smoking, and age of ≥60 years and +2 points for atherosclerotic disease, yielding a bootstrapped C-statistic of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71-0.81) for the prediction of 2-year MACE. Implementation of biomarker data conferred improved performance (0.83, 95% CI: 0.78-0.88), with a simplified model showing similar performance (0.80, 95% CI: 0.74-0.86). The biomarker-enhanced and simplified prediction models achieved a C-statistic of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.93) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64-0.83) for the prediction of 5-year cardiovascular death. CONCLUSION: Biomarker-enhanced risk prediction strategies allow the identification of cancer patients at high risk of MACE and cardiovascular death. While external validation studies are ongoing, this first-of-its-kind risk score may provide the basis for personalized cardiovascular risk assessment across cancer entities.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Humans - administration & dosage
Male - administration & dosage
Female - administration & dosage
Prospective Studies - administration & dosage
Middle Aged - administration & dosage
Cardiovascular Diseases - blood, mortality, diagnosis
Neoplasms - blood, diagnosis, mortality, complications
Aged - administration & dosage
Biomarkers - blood
Risk Assessment - administration & dosage
Heart Disease Risk Factors - administration & dosage
Predictive Value of Tests - administration & dosage
Prognosis - administration & dosage
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain - blood
Time Factors - administration & dosage
Peptide Fragments - blood
Growth Differentiation Factor 15 - blood
Risk Factors - administration & dosage
Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 - blood

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
C-reactive protein
growth differentiation factor 15
major adverse cardiovascular events
N-terminal pro-BNP
personalized risk assessment
precision medicine
prevention
© Med Uni GrazImprint