Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Guidetti, F; Giraldo, CIS; Shchendrygina, A; Kida, K; Niederseer, D; Basic, C; Rainer, PP; Zaleska-Kociecka, M; Ogola, E; Mohty, D; Lanfranchi, G; Sari, NY; Einarsson, H; Zurek, M; Ruschitzka, F; Savarese, G; Mewton, N.
Differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction management between care providers: an international survey
EUR J HEART FAIL. 2024; Doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3416 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed PUBMED Central FullText FullText_MUG

 

Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Rainer Peter
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
Aims: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized by growing incidence and poor outcomes. A large majority of HFpEF patients are cared by non-cardiologists. The availability of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as recommended therapy raises the importance of prompt and accurate identification and treatment of HFpEF across diverse healthcare settings. We evaluated HFpEF management across specialties through a survey targeting cardiologists, HF specialists, and non-cardiologists. Methods and results: An independent web-based survey was distributed globally between May and July 2023. We performed a post-hoc analysis, comparing cardiologists, HF specialists, and non-cardiologists. A total of 1460 physicians (61% male, median age 41[34-49]) from 95 countries completed the survey; 20% were HF specialists, 65% cardiologists, and 15% non-cardiologists. Compared with HF specialists, non-cardiologists and cardiologists were less likely to use natriuretic peptides (p = 0.003) and HFpEF scores (p = 0.004) for diagnosis, and were also less likely to have access to or consider specific echocardiographic parameters (p < 0.001) for identifying HFpEF. Diastolic stress tests were used in less than 30% of the cases, regardless of the specialty (p = 1.12). Multidrug treatment strategies were similar across different specialties. While SGLT2i and diuretics were the preferred drugs, angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors were the least frequently prescribed in all three groups. However, when constrained to choose one drug, the proportion of physicians favoring SGLT2i varied significantly among specialties (66% HF specialists, 52% cardiologists, 51% non-cardiologists). Additionally, 10% of non-cardiologists and 8% of cardiologists considered beta blocker the drug of choice for HFpEF. Conclusion: Significant differences among specialty groups were observed in HFpEF management, particularly in the diagnostic work-up. Our results highlight a substantial risk of underdiagnosis and undertreatment of HFpEF patients, especially among non-HF specialists.

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
Heart failure
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Management improvement
SGLT2 inhibitors
Survey
© Med Uni Graz Impressum