Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal
Selected Publication:
SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb
Plante, M; Kwon, JS; Ferguson, S; Samouëlian, V; Ferron, G; Maulard, A; de Kroon, C; van Driel, W; Tidy, J; Williamson, K; Mahner, S; Kommoss, S; Goffin, F; Tamussino, K; Eyjolfsdottir, B; Kim, JW; Gleeson, N; Brotto, L; Tu, DS; Shepherd, LE.
Simple Versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Low-Risk Cervical Cancer
OBSTET GYNECOL SURV. 2024; 79(7): 413-414.
Doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0001027468.31773.ca
Web of Science
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-authors Med Uni Graz
- Tamussino Karl
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- (Abstracted from N Engl J Med 2024;390:9) Radical hysterectomy is the standard-of-care treatment for early-stage cervical cancer; however, observational studies suggest no survival benefit between patients who undergo radical hysterectomy versus simple hysterectomy for stage IA2 cervical cancer. Additionally, 2 recent large studies have raised the question of whether simple hysterectomy compares favorably overall with radical hysterectomy in stage IA2 or IB1 disease with mixed evidence.