Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Hechenberger, S; Helmlinger, B; Tinauer, C; Jauk, E; Ropele, S; Heschl, B; Wurth, S; Damulina, A; Eppinger, S; Demjaha, R; Khalil, M; Enzinger, C; Pinter, D.
Evaluation of a self-administered iPad®-based processing speed assessment for people with multiple sclerosis in a clinical routine setting.
J Neurol. 2024; 271(6):3268-3278 Doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12274-8 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed PUBMED Central FullText FullText_MUG

 

Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Hechenberger Stefanie Maria Charlotte
Pinter Daniela Theresia
Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Damulina Anna
Demjaha Rina
Enzinger Christian
Eppinger Sebastian
Helmlinger Birgit
Jauk Emanuel
Khalil Michael
Ropele Stefan
Tinauer Christian Gerhard
Wurth Sebastian
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Limited resources often hinder regular cognitive assessment of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) in standard clinical care. A self-administered iPad®-based cognitive screening-tool (Processing Speed Test; PST) might mitigate this problem. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the PST in clinical routine. METHODS: We investigated the feasibility of the PST in both a quiet and a waiting room setting. We assessed the validity of the PST in comparison with the established Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). We explored associations between processing speed assessments and the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters, and psychological factors. Additionally, we explored the ability of the PST to detect impairment in processing speed compared to the SDMT. RESULTS: The PST was feasible in the waiting room setting. PST and SDMT correlated comparably with the BICAMS, MRI parameters, and psychological variables. Of 172 pwMS, 50 (30.8%) showed cognitive impairment according to the BICAMS; respective values were 47 (27.3%) for the SDMT and 9 (5.2%) for the PST. CONCLUSIONS: The PST performed in a waiting room setting correlates strongly with established cognitive tests. It thus may be used to assess processing speed in a resource-efficient manner and complement cognitive assessment in clinical routine. Despite comparable validity of the PST and SDMT, we identified more pwMS with impaired processing speed using normative data of the SDMT compared to the PST and advise caution, that the common cut-off score of - 1.5 SD from the current PST is not appropriate in Europe.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Humans - administration & dosage
Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging
Male - administration & dosage
Female - administration & dosage
Middle Aged - administration & dosage
Adult - administration & dosage
Neuropsychological Tests - administration & dosage
Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology, diagnosis, diagnostic imaging
Computers, Handheld - administration & dosage
Feasibility Studies - administration & dosage
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - administration & dosage
Aged - administration & dosage
Processing Speed - administration & dosage

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
Multiple sclerosis
Cognition
Processing speed
Cognitive assessment
MRI
iPad (R)-based test
© Med Uni Graz Impressum