Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Incesu, RB; Morra, S; Scheipner, L; Barletta, F; Baudo, A; Garcia, CC; Tappero, S; Piccinelli, ML; Tian, Z; Saad, F; Shariat, SF; de, Cobelli, O; Terrone, C; Chun, FKH; Carmignani, L; Briganti, A; Ahyai, S; Longo, N; Tilki, D; Graefen, M; Karakiewicz, PI.
A population-based validation of the IGCCCG Update Consortium for survival in metastatic non-seminoma testis cancer.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2024; 54(5):592-598 Doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyae011
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Co-authors Med Uni Graz
Ahyai Sascha
Scheipner Lukas
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: In 2021, the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) Update Consortium reported improved overall survival (OS) rates in a modern cohort of metastatic non-seminoma testis cancer patients within each of the IGCCCG prognosis groups (96% in good vs. 89% in intermediate vs. 67% in poor), compared to the previous IGCCCG publication (92% in good vs. 80% in intermediate vs. 48% in poor). We hypothesized that a similar survival improvement may apply to a contemporary North-American population-based cohort of non-seminoma testis cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2018) was used. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested the effect of IGCCCG prognosis groups on overall mortality (OM). RESULTS: Of 1672 surgically treated metastatic non-seminoma patients, 778 (47%) exhibited good vs. 251 (15%) intermediate vs. 643 (38%) poor prognosis. In the overall cohort, five-year OS rate was 94% for good prognosis vs. 87% for intermediate prognosis vs. 65% for poor prognosis. In multivariable Cox regression models predicting OM, intermediate (Hazard ratio [HR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-3.9, P < 0.001) and poor prognosis group (HR 6.6, 95% CI 1.0-1.0, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of higher OM, relative to good prognosis group. CONCLUSIONS: The survival improvement reported by the IGCCCG Update Consortium is also operational in non-seminoma testis cancer patients within the most contemporary SEER database. This observation indicates that the survival improvement is not only applicable to centres of excellence, but also applies to other institutions at large.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Humans - administration & dosage
Male - administration & dosage
Testicular Neoplasms - mortality, pathology
Adult - administration & dosage
Prognosis - administration & dosage
SEER Program - administration & dosage
Middle Aged - administration & dosage
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - mortality, pathology, therapy
Survival Rate - administration & dosage
Young Adult - administration & dosage
Neoplasm Metastasis - administration & dosage

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
testis cancer
testicular cancer
non-seminoma
survival
IGCCCG
germ cell tumour
© Med Uni GrazImprint