Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Go directly to the nagivation.
Go directly to the content.

Navigation/Search

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Gertz, RJ; Gerhardt, F; Pienn, M; Lennartz, S; Kröger, JR; Caldeira, L; Pennig, L; Schömig, TH; Hokamp, NG; Maintz, D; Rosenkranz, S; Bunck, AC.
Dual-layer dual-energy CT-derived pulmonary perfusion for the differentiation of acute pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
EUR RADIOL. 2023; Doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10337-4 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

Co-authors Med Uni Graz: Pienn Michael
Altmetrics:
Dimensions Citations:
Plum Analytics:
Scite (citation analytics):
Abstract:: Objectives To evaluate dual-layer dual-energy computed tomography (dlDECT)-derived pulmonary perfusion maps for differentiation between acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).Methods This retrospective study included 131 patients (57 patients with acute PE, 52 CTEPH, 22 controls), who underwent CT pulmonary angiography on a dlDECT. Normal and malperfused areas of lung parenchyma were semiautomatically contoured using iodine density overlay (IDO) maps. First-order histogram features of normal and malperfused lung tissue were extracted. Iodine density (ID) was normalized to the mean pulmonary artery (MPA) and the left atrium (LA). Furthermore, morphological imaging features for both acute and chronic PE, as well as the combination of histogram and morphological imaging features, were evaluated.Results In acute PE, normal perfused lung areas showed a higher mean and peak iodine uptake normalized to the MPA than in CTEPH (both p < 0.001). After normalizing mean ID in perfusion defects to the LA, patients with acute PE had a reduced average perfusion (IDmean,LA) compared to both CTEPH patients and controls (p < 0.001 for both). IDmean,LA allowed for a differentiation between acute PE and CTEPH with moderate accuracy (AUC: 0.72, sensitivity 74%, specificity 64%), resulting in a PPV and NPV for CTEPH of 64% and 70%. Combining IDmean,LA in the malperfused areas with the diameter of the MPA (MPA(dia)) significantly increased its ability to differentiate between acute PE and CTEPH (sole MPA(dia): AUC: 0.76, 95%-CI: 0.68-0.85 vs. MPA(dia) + 256.3 * IDmean,LA - 40.0: AUC: 0.82, 95%-CI: 0.74-0.90, p = 0.04).Conclusion dlDECT enables quantification and characterization of pulmonary perfusion patterns in acute PE and CTEPH. Although these lack precision when used as a standalone criterion, when combined with morphological CT parameters, they hold potential to enhance differentiation between the two diseases.Clinical relevance statement Differentiating between acute PE and CTEPH based on morphological CT parameters is challenging, often leading to a delay in CTEPH diagnosis. By revealing distinct pulmonary perfusion patterns in both entities, dlDECT may facilitate timely diagnosis of CTEPH, ultimately improving clinical management.
Find related publications in this database (Keywords): Computed tomography; Pulmonary perfusion; Acute pulmonary embolism; Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension