Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Sokolowski, A; Theisen, K; Arefnia, B; Payer, M; Lorenzoni, M; Sokolowski, A.
A randomized clinical trial of phycogenic materials for sinus grafting with hydroxyapatite versus biphasic calcium phosphate: 2 years clinical outcomes.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024; 35(2):155-166 Doi: 10.1111/clr.14209
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Leading authors Med Uni Graz
Sokolowski Alwin
Sokolowski Armin
Co-authors Med Uni Graz
Arefnia Behrouz
Lorenzoni Martin
Payer Michael
Theisen Kerstin
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: To assess in a prospective randomized trial two phycogenic bone substitutes-biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) versus almost pure hydroxyapatite (HA)-for their volume stability and clinical implications after sinus floor elevation (SFE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients requiring lateral-window SFE 6 months prior to implant surgery were randomized to a BCP or HA group. As primary outcome, the grafts were analyzed for volume stability, using four cone-beam computed tomography scans obtained immediately/6/12/24 months after SFE. Secondary outcomes were implant survivval, success, periotest values, oral-health-related quality of life (OHIP-G14), and pain (VAS). RESULTS: Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test revealed normal distribution of samples (p = .200). At 6/12/24 months, the augmented volumes decreased to 96/92/90% (HA) or 99/96/96% (BCP). Volume changes were significantly a factor of time (p < .001; generalized linear model with repeated measures) and reached significantly lower values in HA group (p = .018). Significant intergroup difference in volume losses was notable at 24 months (p = .021; t-test for independent samples). Periotest values decreased from -3/-4.1 (HA/BCP) after implant placement to -6.3/-4.5 (HA/BCP) after 6 months. OHIP scores diverged at 2 months (HA: 9.5; BCP: 5.2) and largely resolved by 24 months (HA: 1.3; BCP: 1.9). VAS scores were comparable, 2.2 at 1 week after SFE being their highest mean level. CONCLUSIONS: After 2 years, both groups experienced no biological or technical complications, demonstrating a consistent healing trajectory without notable symptoms. Although no significant differences were observed in implant stability and survival, BCP demonstrated higher volume stability than HA.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Humans - administration & dosage
Durapatite - therapeutic use
Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods
Prospective Studies - administration & dosage
Quality of Life - administration & dosage
Hydroxyapatites - therapeutic use
Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use
Maxillary Sinus - surgery

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
biomaterials
bone implant interactions
bone regeneration
bone substitutes
clinical research
clinical trials
CT imaging
sinus floor elevation
© Med Uni GrazImprint