Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz
Gewählte Publikation:
SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb
National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery.
Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries.
Br J Surg. 2023; 110(7):804-817
Doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad092
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Study Group Mitglieder der Med Uni Graz:
- Andrianakis Alexandros
- Cohnert Tina Ulrike
- Holzmeister Clemens
- Lumenta David Benjamin
- Mikalauskas Saulius
- Singer Georg
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- BACKGROUND: Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. METHODS: This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low-middle-income countries. RESULTS: In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of 'single-use' consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low-middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high- and low-middle-income countries.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
- Humans - administration & dosage
- Developing Countries - administration & dosage
- Delivery of Health Care - administration & dosage
- Health Personnel - administration & dosage
- Environment - administration & dosage