Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Go directly to the nagivation.
Go directly to the content.

Navigation/Search

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Cadamuro, J; Winzer, J; Perkhofer, L; von, Meyer, A; Bauça, JM; Plekhanova, O; Linko-Parvinen, A; Watine, J; Kniewallner, KM; Keppel, MH; Šálek, T; Mrazek, C; Felder, TK; Oberkofler, H; Haschke-Becher, E; Vermeersch, P; Kristoffersen, AH; Eisl, C.
Efficiency, efficacy and subjective user satisfaction of alternative laboratory report formats. An investigation on behalf of the Working Group for Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST), of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM).
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022; 60(9): 1356-1364. Doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0269
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

Co-authors Med Uni Graz: Keppel Martin Helmut
Altmetrics:
Dimensions Citations:
Plum Analytics:
Scite (citation analytics):
Abstract:: OBJECTIVES: Although laboratory result presentation may lead to information overload and subsequent missed or delayed diagnosis, little has been done in the past to improve this post-analytical issue. We aimed to investigate the efficiency, efficacy and user satisfaction of alternative report formats. METHODS: We redesigned cumulative (sparkline format) and single reports (improved tabular and z-log format) and tested these on 46 physicians, nurses and medical students in comparison to the classical tabular formats, by asking standardized questions on general items on the reports as well as on suspected diagnosis and follow-up treatment or diagnostics. RESULTS: Efficacy remained at a very high level both in the new formats as well as in the classical formats. We found no significant difference in any of the groups. Efficiency improved in all groups when using the sparkline cumulative format and marginally when showing the improved tabular format. When asking medical questions, efficiency and efficacy remained similar between report formats and groups. All alternative reports were subjectively more attractive to the majority of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Showing cumulative reports as a graphical display led to faster detection of general information on the report with the same level of correctness. Considering the familiarity bias of the classical single report formats, the borderline-significant improvement of the alternative tabular format and the non-inferiority of the z-log format, suggests that single reports might benefit from some improvements derived from basic information design.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing): Chemistry, Clinical - administration & dosage; Humans - administration & dosage; Laboratories - administration & dosage; Personal Satisfaction - administration & dosage; Research Report - administration & dosage
Find related publications in this database (Keywords): format; information design; laboratory report; postanalyticsz