Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Go directly to the nagivation.
Go directly to the content.

Navigation/Search

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Saeed, D; Potapov, E; Loforte, A; Morshuis, M; Schibilsky, D; Zimpfer, D; Riebandt, J; Pappalardo, F; Attisani, M; Rinaldi, M; Haneya, A; Ramjankhan, F; Donker, DW; Jorde, UP; Stein, J; Tsyganenko, D; Jawad, K; Wieloch, R; Ayala, R; Cremer, J; Borger, MA; Lichtenberg, A; Gummert, J, , Durable, MCS, after, ECLS, Study, Group.
Transition From Temporary to Durable Circulatory Support Systems.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76(25): 2956-2964. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.036
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

Co-authors Med Uni Graz: Zimpfer Daniel
Altmetrics:
Dimensions Citations:
Plum Analytics:
Scite (citation analytics):
Abstract:: BACKGROUND: The decision to implant durable mechanical circulatory systems (MCSs) in patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is challenging due to expected poor outcomes in these patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify outcome predictors that may facilitate future patient selection and decision making. METHODS: The Durable MCS after ECLS registry is a multicenter retrospective study that gathered data on consecutive patients who underwent MCS implantation after ECLS between January 2010 and August 2018 in 11 high-volume European centers. Several perioperative parameters were collected. The primary endpoint was survival at 1 year after durable MCS implantation. RESULTS: A total of 531 durable MCSs after ECLS were implanted during this period. The average patient age was 53 ± 12 years old. ECLS cannulation was peripheral in 87% of patients and 33% of the patients had history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ECLS implantation. The 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 77%, 53%, and 43%, respectively. The following predictors for 1-year outcome have been observed: age, female sex, lactate value, Model of End-Stage Liver Disease XI score, history of atrial fibrillation, redo surgery, and body mass index >30 kg/m². On the basis of this data, a risk score and an app to estimate 1-year mortality was created. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome in patients receiving durable MCS after ECLS remains limited, yet preoperative factors may allow differentiating futile patients from those with significant survival benefit.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing): Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods; Clinical Decision-Making - methods; Europe - epidemiology; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - instrumentation, methods, statistics & numerical data; Female - administration & dosage; Heart-Assist Devices - statistics & numerical data; Humans - administration & dosage; Male - administration & dosage; Middle Aged - administration & dosage; Mortality - administration & dosage; Patient Selection - administration & dosage; Prognosis - administration & dosage; Registries - statistics & numerical data; Retrospective Studies - administration & dosage; Risk Factors - administration & dosage; Shock, Cardiogenic - physiopathology, therapy; Survival Rate - administration & dosage
Find related publications in this database (Keywords): extracorporeal life support; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; mechanical circulatory support; outcome; predictors