Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

Grimm, M; Zimpfer, D; Czerny, M; Kilo, J; Kasimir, MT; Kramer, L; Krokovay, A; Wolner, E.
Neurocognitive deficit following mitral valve surgery.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003; 23(3):265-71 Doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00796-0
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Co-authors Med Uni Graz
Zimpfer Daniel
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Neurocognitive deficit is an important complication in patients undergoing open heart surgery. The aim of this prospective, contemporary study was to objectively measure neurocognitive brain function following mechanical mitral valve replacement and mitral valve repair. METHODS: Forty consecutive, unselected patients (mechanical valve replacement n=20, mean age 65+/-14; valve repair n=20, mean age 64+/-7, P=0.896) entered this prospective, contemporary study. Neurocognitive function was objectively measured by means of P300 auditory evoked potentials (peak latencies, ms) and two standard psychometric tests (Mini Mental State Examination, Trailmaking Test A (TTA)), preoperatively, 7 days and 4 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Before operation, neurocognitive brain function was comparable in both patients groups (mechanical valve replacement versus valve repair: P300 potentials 374+/-25 versus 378+/-46 ms; P=0.791 and TTA 57+/-15 versus 54+/-10 s; P=0.552). Following mechanical valve replacement, neurocognitive function continuously worsened (7 day-follow-up: P300 potentials 392+/-28, P=0.001 versus preop and TTA 65+/-17, P=0.0001; 4-month follow-up: P300 potentials 406+/-39, P=0.0004; TTA 69+/-17, P=0.0001). Interestingly, neurocognitive brain function was unaffected in patients undergoing valve repair (7-day follow-up: P300 potentials 386+/-40, P=0.890 versus preop and TTA: 53+/-10, P=0.644; 4-month follow-up: P300 potentials 374+/-36, P=0.166 and TTA 54+/-11, P=0.147). At 4-month follow-up, patients with mechanical prostheses performed worse as compared to valve repair (P300 potentials: P=0.024; TTA P=0.014). CONCLUSION: As shown by P300 auditory evoked potentials and Trailmaking Test A, there is marked neurocognitive damage related to mechanical valve replacement, whereas mitral valve repair does not affect neurocognitive function. This finding supports the beneficial effect of mitral valve repair over mechanical valve replacement in the decision-making tree of borderline cases, which are suitable for both types of procedure.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Adult - administration & dosage
Aged - administration & dosage
Aged, 80 and over - administration & dosage
Cognition Disorders - etiology
Decision Making - administration & dosage
Event-Related Potentials, P300 - administration & dosage
Evoked Potentials, Auditory - administration & dosage
Female - administration & dosage
Follow-Up Studies - administration & dosage
Heart Valve Prosthesis - administration & dosage
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Humans - administration & dosage
Male - administration & dosage
Middle Aged - administration & dosage
Mitral Valve - surgery
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - surgery
Mitral Valve Stenosis - surgery
Neuropsychological Tests - administration & dosage
Postoperative Complications - administration & dosage
Prospective Studies - administration & dosage
Psychometrics - administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome - administration & dosage

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
neurocognitive function
mitral valve surgery
mechanical valves
reconstruction
© Med Uni GrazImprint