Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Go directly to the nagivation.
Go directly to the content.

Navigation/Search

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Oedingen, C; Bartling, T; Schrem, H; Mühlbacher, AC; Krauth, C.
Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: A discrete choice experiment.
SOC SCI MED. 2021; 287: 114360 Doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114360
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

Co-authors Med Uni Graz: Schrem Harald Heinrich
Altmetrics:
Dimensions Citations:
Plum Analytics:
Scite (citation analytics):
Abstract:: This study aimed to assess public preferences for the allocation of donor organs in Germany with the focus on ethical principles of distributive justice. We performed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) using a self-completed online questionnaire. Based on a systematic review and focus group discussions, six attributes, each with two-four levels, were selected (corresponding principle of distributive justice in brackets), including (1) life years gained after transplantation (principle of distributive justice: effectiveness/benefit - utilitarianism), (2) quality of life after transplantation (effectiveness/benefit - utilitarianism), (3) chance for a further donor organ offer (principle of distributive justice: medical urgency - favouring the worst-off), (4) age (medical and social risk factors: sociodemographic status), (5) registered donor (principle of distributive justice: value for society), and (6) individual role in causing organ failure (principle of distributive justice: own fault). Each respondent was presented with eight choice sets and asked to choose between two hypothetical patients without an opt-out. Data were analysed using conditional logit, mixed logit and latent class models. The final sample comprised 1028 respondents. Choice decisions were significantly influenced by all attributes except chance for a further donor organ offer. The attributes of good quality of life after transplantation, younger age, and no individual role in causing organ failure had the greatest impact on choice decisions. Life years gained after transplantation and being a registered donor were less important for the public. The latent class model identified four classes with preference heterogeneities. Respondents preferred to allocate deceased donor organs by criteria related to effectiveness/benefit, whereas medical urgency was of minor importance. Therefore, a public propensity for a rational, utilitarian, ethical model of allocation could be identified. Public preferences can help to inform policy to warrant socially responsible allocation systems and thus improve organ donation rates.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing): Choice Behavior - administration & dosage; Focus Groups - administration & dosage; Humans - administration & dosage; Organ Transplantation - administration & dosage; Patient Preference - administration & dosage; Quality of Life - administration & dosage; Tissue Donors - administration & dosage; Tissue and Organ Procurement - administration & dosage
Find related publications in this database (Keywords): Discrete choice experiment; Distributive justice; Organ allocation; Preferences; Public perspective; Germany