Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Go directly to the nagivation.
Go directly to the content.

Navigation/Search

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Wenzl, EM; Riedl, R; Borenich, A; Petritsch, W; Wenzl, HH.
Low prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in vegetarians.
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2021; 40(2):154-161 Doi: 10.1007/s12664-021-01156-w
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

Co-authors Med Uni Graz: Borenich Andrea; Petritsch Wolfgang; Riedl Regina
Altmetrics:
Dimensions Citations:
Plum Analytics:
Scite (citation analytics):
Abstract:: BACKGROUND: Dietary modification could reduce the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Circumstantial evidence suggests that gastroesophageal reflux is less prevalent in people adhering to a vegetarian diet. We aimed to study the relationship between vegetarianism and the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (GERS). METHODS: This study compares the prevalence of GERS in vegetarians with non-vegetarian controls from the general population. Frequency and severity of GERS (heartburn and/or acid regurgitation) were assessed with a self-administrated questionnaire. RESULTS: Within 1 year, any GERS were experienced by 19 of 100 (19%) vegetarians and by 98 of 250 (39.2%) non-vegetarian controls (p < 0.001). Frequent GERS, defined as GERS on at least 1 day per week, were noted in 3% of vegetarians and in 12.8% of controls (p = 0.006). Reflux symptoms were significantly less severe in vegetarians than in non-vegetarians (p < 0.001). According to multivariable analysis, independent predictors of GERS included male sex, current smoking, BMI ≥ 25 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-3.31), and a non-vegetarian diet (OR = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.20-3.97); non-vegetarian diet independently predicted frequent GERS (OR 4.03; 95% CI, 1.17-13.9). An increased risk of GERS (OR = 2.17; 95% CI, 1.09-4.29) and frequent GERS (OR 4.00; 95% CI, 1.13-14.18) in non-vegetarians were also demonstrated by logistic regression of matched data. In non-vegetarians, the risk of reflux symptoms was not significantly related to meat intake. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and severity of GERS are lower in vegetarians than in non-vegetarians from the general population. The results are in line with a mitigating effect of vegetarianism on GERS. Data must be interpreted with caution given the retrospective study design and the small sample size.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing): Gastroesophageal Reflux - epidemiology, etiology; Heartburn - administration & dosage; Humans - administration & dosage; Male - administration & dosage; Prevalence - administration & dosage; Retrospective Studies - administration & dosage; Vegetarians - administration & dosage
Find related publications in this database (Keywords): Diet; Gastric acid reflux; Gastroesophageal reflux; GERD; Lifestyle; Retrospective study; Surveys; Vegetarian diet; Vegetarianism