Selected Publication:
SHR
Neuro
Cancer
Cardio
Lipid
Metab
Microb
Sola, L; Levin, NW; Johnson, DW; Pecoits-Filho, R; Aljubori, HM; Chen, Y; Claus, S; Collins, A; Cullis, B; Feehally, J; Harden, PN; Hassan, MH; Ibhais, F; Kalantar-Zadeh, K; Levin, A; Saleh, A; Schneditz, D; Tchokhonelidze, I; Turan Kazancioglu, R; Twahir, A; Walker, R; Were, AJO; Yu, X; Finkelstein, FO.
Development of a framework for minimum and optimal safety and quality standards for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2020; 10(1):e55-e62-e55-e62
Doi: 10.1016/j.kisu.2019.11.009
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-authors Med Uni Graz
-
Schneditz Daniel
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
-
Substantial heterogeneity in practice patterns around the world has resulted in wide variations in the quality and type of dialysis care delivered. This is particularly so in countries without universal standards of care and governmental (or other organizational) oversight. Most high-income countries have developed such oversight based on documentation of adherence to standardized, evidence-based guidelines. Many low- and lower-middle-income countries have no or only limited organized oversight systems to ensure that care is safe and effective. The implementation and oversight of basic standards of care requires sufficient infrastructure and appropriate workforce and financial resources to support the basic levels of care and safety practices. It is important to understand how these standards then can be reasonably adapted and applied in low- and lower-middle-income countries.
© 2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.