Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal
Selected Publication:
SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb
Kim, JK; Chua, ME; Ming, JM; Santos, JD; Zani-Ruttenstock, E; Marson, A; Bayley, M; Koyle, MA.
A critical review of recent clinical practice guidelines on management of cryptorchidism.
J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53(10): 2041-2047.
Doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.050
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-authors Med Uni Graz
- Ruttenstock Elke Maria
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- Limited efforts have been made in assessing the qualities of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on cryptorchidism (UDT). This appraisal aims to determine the quality of recent CPGs on the management of UDT. After systematic literature search, all English-based CPGs providing recommendations for the management of UDT from 2012 to 2017 were reviewed. Using the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines and Research Evaluation) instrument, eligible CPGs were independently appraised by 5 reviewers. Domain scores were calculated and summarized. Intraclass coefficient (ICC) was used to assess for interrater reliability. Five CPGs from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), American Urological Association (AUA), British Association of Pediatric Surgeons/British Association of Urologic Surgeons (BAPS/BAUS), Canadian Urological Association (CUA), and European Association of Urology/European Society for Pediatric Urology (EAU/ESPU) were assessed. There was a solid agreement (ICC: 0.749) among the 5 reviewers (p<0.001). Most recommendations for diagnostic and treatment approaches were consistent across CPGs. For most guidelines, the domains of 'clarity of presentation,' 'scope and purpose,' 'stakeholder involvement,' and 'rigor of development' were high, while 'applicability' was low. Most guidelines on UDT score high in the AGREE II domains and have consistent recommendations. To improve the 'applicability' domain, future guidelines should improve on aspects that facilitate implementation of the recommendations. Systematic review. V (based on the lowest level of evidence utilized by the assessed guidelines). Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
- Cryptorchidism - therapy
- Europe -
- Humans -
- Male -
- Practice Guidelines as Topic -
- Reproducibility of Results -
- United States -
- Urology - organization & administration
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
- Undescended testes
- Cryptorchidism
- Clinical practice guidelines
- AGREE II instrument
- Appraisal