Selected Publication:
SHR
Neuro
Cancer
Cardio
Lipid
Metab
Microb
Qu, Z; Krauth, C; Amelung, VE; Kaltenborn, A; Gwiasda, J; Harries, L; Beneke, J; Schrem, H; Liersch, S.
Decision modelling for economic evaluation of liver transplantation.
World J Hepatol. 2018; 10(11): 837-848.
Doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i11.837
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-authors Med Uni Graz
-
Schrem Harald Heinrich
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
-
As the gap between a shortage of organs and the immense demand for liver grafts persists, every available donor liver needs to be optimized for utility, urgency and equity. To overcome this challenge, decision modelling might allow us to gather evidence from previous studies as well as compare the costs and consequences of alternative options. For public health policy and clinical intervention assessment, it is a potentially powerful tool. The most commonly used types of decision analytical models include decision trees, the Markov model, microsimulation, discrete event simulation and the system dynamic model. Analytic models could support decision makers in the field of liver transplantation when facing specific problems by synthesizing evidence, comprising all relevant options, generalizing results to other contexts, extending the time horizon and exploring the uncertainty. For modeling studies of economic evaluation for transplantation, understanding the current nature of the disease is crucial, as well as the selection of appropriate modelling techniques. The quality and availability of data is another key element for the selection and development of decision analytical models. In addition, good practice guidelines should be complied, which is important for standardization and comparability between economic outputs.
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
-
Cost benefit analysis
-
Decision tree
-
Liver transplantation
-
Decision analysis
-
Decision support models
-
Resource allocation
-
Cost effectiveness