Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Tschauner, S; Marterer, R; Nagy, E; Apfaltrer, G; Riccabona, M; Singer, G; Stücklschweiger, G; Guss, H; Sorantin, E.
Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.
PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0178747 Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178747 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed PUBMED Central FullText FullText_MUG

 

Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Marterer Robert
Tschauner Sebastian
Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Apfaltrer Georg
Nagy Eszter
Riccabona Michael
Singer Georg
Sorantin Erich
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare surface doses of a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) device in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms. METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used to measure and compare surface doses between CBCT and MDCT in a left ankle and a right wrist pediatric phantom. In both modalities adapted pediatric dose protocols were utilized to achieve realistic imaging conditions. All measurements were repeated three times to prove test-retest reliability. Additionally, objective and subjective image quality parameters were assessed. RESULTS: Average surface doses were 3.8 ±2.1 mGy for the ankle, and 2.2 ±1.3 mGy for the wrist in CBCT. The corresponding surface doses in optimized MDCT were 4.5 ±1.3 mGy for the ankle, and 3.4 ±0.7 mGy for the wrist. Overall, mean surface dose was significantly lower in CBCT (3.0 ±1.9 mGy vs. 3.9 ±1.2 mGy, p<0.001). Subjectively rated general image quality was not significantly different between the study protocols (p = 0.421), whereas objectively measured image quality parameters were in favor of CBCT (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adapted extremity CBCT imaging protocols have the potential to fall below optimized pediatric ankle and wrist MDCT doses at comparable image qualities. These possible dose savings warrant further development and research in pediatric extremity CBCT applications.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Ankle - diagnostic imaging
Child - administration & dosage
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods
Humans - administration & dosage
Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods
Phantoms, Imaging - administration & dosage
Radiation Dosage - administration & dosage
Wrist - diagnostic imaging

© Med Uni Graz Impressum