Gewählte Publikation:
SHR
Neuro
Krebs
Kardio
Lipid
Stoffw
Microb
McLay, L; Schafer, MCM; van der Meer, L; Couper, L; McKenzie, E; O'Reilly, MF; Lancioni, GE; Marschik, PB; Sigafoos, J; Sutherland, D; .
Acquisition, Preference and Follow-up Comparison Across Three AAC Modalities Taught to Two Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
INT J DISABIL DEV EDUC. 2017; 64(2): 117-130.
Doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2016.1188892
Web of Science
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
-
Marschik Peter
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- Identifying an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) method for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) might be informed by comparing their performance with, and preference for, a range of communication modalities. Towards this end, the present study involved two children with ASD who were taught to request the continuation of toy play by: (a) signing MORE, (b) exchanging a picture card representing MORE, and (c) touching a MORE symbol from the screen of a speech-generating device. The children were also given opportunities to choose among the three modalities to identify their preferred method of communication. Both children performed better with picture exchange and the speech-generating device than with manual signing, but had variable performance during follow-up. Both children more often chose the speech-generating device, suggesting a preference for that modality. We conclude that concurrent intervention across several communication methods can generate data to inform the selection of an AAC modality.
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
-
Augmentative and alternative communication
-
autism spectrum disorder
-
manual signing
-
modality sampling
-
picture exchange
-
requesting
-
speech-generating device
-
systematic instruction