Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

Wagner, A; Seemann, R; Schicho, K; Ewers, R; Piehslinger, E.
A comparative analysis of optical and conventional axiography for the analysis of temporomandibular joint movements.
J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90(5):503-509 Doi: 10.1016/S0022391303004827
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Co-authors Med Uni Graz
Schicho Kurt
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
Currently available systems for pantographic tracing are heavy, bulky, and can interfere with jaw movements. This study describes the development and clinical application of optoelectronic axiography designed to overcome system inherent problems of conventional bulky frame-based registration axiography. The purpose of this study is the comparison of the newly developed system and conventional axiography. Three-dimensional recordings of condylar pathways were acquired by means of infrared digitizers interfaced to newly developed software. Ten distinct curves in each of 10 subjects were recorded by synchronous optoelectronic axiography (100 tracings) and by conventional axiography (100 tracings). Usually, two 3-dimensional (3D) light weight sensors are provisionally fixed to the facial surface of a maxillary and mandibular incisor by means of a single orthodontic bracket. To allow for direct comparison of all 100 pairs of curves in this study, the 3D sensors of the optoelectronic system were attached to the bulky double face-bow system of the axiograph. The conformity of tracings (protrusion, opening/closing, mediotrusion, and laterotrusion) was evaluated by means of correlation analysis. Resulting axiographic recordings from both systems were evaluated by 3 experts (dentists, experienced in axiographic investigations, who were blind to the source of the data), focusing on standardized qualitative criteria of the recordings (homogeneity/smoothness, pathway-characteristics, excursion, and left/right-symmetry). After testing for normal distribution of the ratio scaled data (length of pathway, horizontal condylar inclination [HCI], Bennett angle) with the Kolmogoroff-Smirnov test (alpha=.01), axiographic curves were quantitatively compared by means of an intraclass correlation coefficient ([ICC] alpha =.01). The Wilcoxon test (alpha=.01) was used to evaluate equivalence of ordinally scaled values (homogeneity of tracings) and Cohen's Kappa was used to compare excursion and left/right symmetry. High correspondence between curves recorded by conventional and optoelectronic axiography was observed. The mean differences of lengths between the protrusive, opening/closing, and mediotrusive pathways were 0.0 mm, 0.6 mm, and 0.1 mm, respectively. Pathways and values for HCI were found highly correlated (pathways: 95% CI of ICC 0.9776-0.9908; HCI: 95% CI of ICC 0.8641-0.9597). The 95% CIs for differences of pathways, HCI-value, and Bennett angle were -0.1mm/0.3mm, -3.4 degrees/1.9 degrees, and -2.8 degrees/4.8 degrees, respectively. Pathway characteristics also corresponded well (Cohen's Kappa: 0.73 for symmetric and 0.72 for asymmetric movements), 0.77 for left/right symmetry, whereas other characteristics showed less significant correlation (Cohen's Kappa of excursion: 0.21 for symmetric and 0.09 for asymmetric movements, homogeneity: 0.08 for symmetric and 0.15 for asymmetric movements). Within the limitations of this study, optoelectronic axiography proved to be an applicable, promising technique, leading to diagnostic interpretations equivalent (with respect to the CIs) to conventional axiography.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Dental Occlusion -
Electronics - instrumentation
Humans -
Imaging, Three-Dimensional -
Infrared Rays -
Jaw Relation Record - instrumentation Jaw Relation Record - methods
Movement -
Observer Variation -
Optics and Photonics - instrumentation
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Statistics, Nonparametric -
Temporomandibular Joint - physiology

© Med Uni GrazImprint