Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz
Gewählte Publikation:
SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb
Benlidayi, ME; Gaggl, A; Bürger, H; Brandner, C; Kurkcu, M; Unlügenç, H.
Comparative study of the osseointegration of dental implants after different bone augmentation techniques: vascularized femur flap, non-vascularized femur graft and mandibular bone graft.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22(6):594-599
Doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02013.x
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
- Bürger Karl-Heinz
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of the dental implants placed into the mandible augmented with different techniques in pigs. Material and methods Four adult domestic pigs were used. Horizontal augmentation of the mandible was performed in animals by using vascularized femur flap (VFF), non-vascularized femur graft (NVFG) and monocortical mandibular block graft (MG). After 5 months of healing 10 dental implants were placed into each augmented site. The pigs were sacrificed after 3 months of healing. Undecalcified sections were prepared for histomorphometric analysis. Results Mean bone-implant contact (BIC) values for implants placed into MG, NVFG and VFF were 57.38 +/- 11.97%, 76.5 +/- 7.88%, 76.53 +/- 8.15%, respectively. The BIC values of NVFG and VFF group were significantly greater than MG group (P < 0.001). On the other hand, there was not statistically significant difference between NVFG group and VFF group (P=0.999). Conclusion NVFG as well as VFF can be considered as a promising method for augmentation of alveolar defects and the placement of the implants. The selection of non-vascularized graft or vascularized flap depends on the condition of the recipient site. To cite this article:Benlidayi ME, Gaggl A, Burger H, Brandner C, Kurkcu M, Unlugenc H. Comparative study of the osseointegration of dental implants after different bone augmentation techniques: vascularized femur flap, non-vascularized femur graft and mandibular bone graft.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 594-599doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02013.x.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods
- Anastomosis, Surgical -
- Animals -
- Bone Screws -
- Bone Transplantation - methods
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous -
- Dental Implants -
- Femur - blood supply Femur - surgery
- Free Tissue Flaps - blood supply Free Tissue Flaps - classification
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted -
- Mandible - pathology Mandible - surgery
- Microsurgery -
- Osseointegration - physiology
- Periosteum - blood supply Periosteum - surgery
- Surface Properties -
- Swine -
- Time Factors -
- Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods
- Wound Healing - physiology
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
- animal experiments
- bone-implant interactions
- bone regeneration
- guided tissue regeneration