Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

EINSTEIN Investigators; Bauersachs, R; Berkowitz, SD; Brenner, B; Buller, HR; Decousus, H; Gallus, AS; Lensing, AW; Misselwitz, F; Prins, MH; Raskob, GE; Segers, A; Verhamme, P; Wells, P; Agnelli, G; Bounameaux, H; Cohen, A; Davidson, BL; Piovella, F; Schellong, S.
Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism.
N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(26):2499-2510 Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007903 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Study Group Members Med Uni Graz:
Pilger Ernst
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
Background: Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide a simple, fixed-dose regimen for treating acute deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and for continued treatment, without the need for laboratory monitoring. Methods: We conducted an open-label, randomized, event-driven, noninferiority study that compared oral rivaroxaban alone (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with subcutaneous enoxaparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist (either warfarin or acenocoumarol) for 3, 6, or 12 months in patients with acute, symptomatic DVT. In parallel, we carried out a double-blind, randomized, event-driven superiority study that compared rivaroxaban alone (20 mg once daily) with placebo for an additional 6 or 12 months in patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of treatment for venous thromboembolism. The primary efficacy outcome for both studies was recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in the initial-treatment study and major bleeding in the continued-treatment study. Results: The study of rivaroxaban for acute DVT included 3449 patients: 1731 given rivaroxaban and 1718 given enoxaparin plus a vitamin K antagonist. Rivaroxaban had noninferior efficacy with respect to the primary outcome (36 events [2.1%], vs. 51 events with enoxaparin-vitamin K antagonist [3.0%]; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.04; P<0.001). The principal safety outcome occurred in 8.1% of the patients in each group. In the continued-treatment study, which included 602 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 594 in the placebo group, rivaroxaban had superior efficacy (8 events [1.3%], vs. 42 with placebo [7.1%]; hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.39; P<0.001). Four patients in the rivaroxaban group had nonfatal major bleeding (0.7%), versus none in the placebo group (P=0.11). Conclusions: Rivaroxaban offers a simple, single-drug approach to the short-term and continued treatment of venous thrombosis that may improve the benefit-to-risk profile of anticoagulation. (Funded by Bayer Schering Pharma and Ortho-McNeil; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00440193 and NCT00439725.) N Engl J Med 2010;363:2499-510.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Acenocoumarol - adverse effects Acenocoumarol - therapeutic use
Acute Disease -
Administration, Oral -
Aged -
Anticoagulants - adverse effects Anticoagulants - therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method -
Enoxaparin - adverse effects Enoxaparin - therapeutic use
Factor Xa - antagonists & inhibitors
Female -
Hemorrhage - chemically induced
Humans -
Injections, Subcutaneous -
Intention to Treat Analysis -
Kaplan-Meier Estimate -
Male -
Middle Aged -
Morpholines - adverse effects Morpholines - therapeutic use
Pulmonary Embolism - drug therapy
Thiophenes - adverse effects Thiophenes - therapeutic use
Venous Thromboembolism - drug therapy
Venous Thrombosis - drug therapy
Vitamin K - antagonists & inhibitors
Warfarin - adverse effects Warfarin - therapeutic use

© Med Uni GrazImprint