Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz
Gewählte Publikation:
SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb
Sadoghi, P; Thaler, M; Janda, W; Hübl, M; Leithner, A; Labek, G.
Comparative pooled survival and revision rate of Austin-Moore hip arthroplasty in published literature and arthroplasty register data.
J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(8):1349-1353
Doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.011
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
- Sadoghi Patrick
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
- Leithner Andreas
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- The aim was to evaluate the pooled survival and revision rate of Austin-Moore hip arthroplasty (AMHA) in published literature and arthroplasty register data. A comprehensive literature analysis of clinical publications and register reports was conducted with the main endpoints revision surgery and revision rate. Sixteen relevant clinical studies have been found to significantly underestimate revision rates by a ratio of 2.15 compared to register data sets. The medium-term outcome of AMHA showed significantly worse outcomes than the use of other bipolar implants, or modular cervicocephalic prostheses and data of journal publications on revision rates deviate significantly from data of arthroplasty registers. Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip -
- Follow-Up Studies -
- Hip Prosthesis - classification
- Humans -
- Outcome Assessment (Health Care) -
- Prosthesis Failure -
- Registries -
- Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
- Reoperation -
- Survival Rate -
- Survival Rate -
- Treatment Outcome -
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
- arthroplasty
- register data
- revision rate