Gewählte Publikation:
SHR
Neuro
Krebs
Kardio
Lipid
Stoffw
Microb
Zemann, W; Metzler, P; Jacobsen, C; Obwegeser, JA.
Segmental distraction osteogenesis of the anterior alveolar process using tooth-borne devices: is it skeletal movement or mainly dental tipping?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70(6):1292-1299
Doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.12.007
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
-
Zemann Wolfgang
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- Purpose: Segmental distraction osteogenesis of the anterior alveolar process has been introduced as a technique designed to avoid extractions in patients with severe dental crowding. The aim of this study was to quantify the degree of dental tipping within the alveolar segment after distraction osteogenesis. Patients and Methods: Patients treated for dental crowding, retruded anterior alveolar process, or flat curves of Spee using segmental distraction osteogenesis of the anterior alveolar process were included in the study. Dental-borne distraction devices were used while measuring points, and angles were defined to analyze the amount of dental tipping of the lower incisors after distraction. The measurements were performed using cone-beam computed tomographic scans. Periodontal health (eg, gingival recession, tooth mobility, and dental socket depths) was evaluated after distraction. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: Fifteen patients were included in the study. The amount of dental tipping within the total movement of the alveolar process showed a mean of 24% after distraction osteogenesis, whereas the skeletal movement was 76%. Dental socket depths and tooth mobility remained at the same levels as those before distraction osteogenesis. In one third of patients, gingival recession was observed around the canines. Conclusions: Segmental distraction osteogenesis of the anterior process is a powerful technique that can prevent extractions in patients with dental crowding. The technique can also compensate for retruded anterior alveolar process and accelerate or decelerate the curve of Spee. Patients with constricted periodontal health and those with a thin mandibular symphysis, however, cannot be treated with this technique because of the increased risk of dental tipping. Severe gingival recession must also be considered a possible side effect associated with this technique. (C) 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1292-1299, 2012
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
-
Adolescent -
-
Adult -
-
Alveoloplasty - methods
-
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography -
-
Cuspid - physiopathology
-
Female -
-
Gingival Recession - etiology
-
Humans -
-
Incisor - physiopathology
-
Male -
-
Malocclusion - radiography Malocclusion - surgery
-
Mandible - radiography Mandible - surgery
-
Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods
-
Postoperative Complications -
-
Retrospective Studies -
-
Tooth Movement -
-
Treatment Outcome -
-
Young Adult -