Selected Publication:
SHR
Neuro
Cancer
Cardio
Lipid
Metab
Microb
Agresta, F; Ansaloni, L; Baiocchi, GL; Bergamini, C; Campanile, FC; Carlucci, M; Cocorullo, G; Corradi, A; Franzato, B; Lupo, M; Mandala, V; Mirabella, A; Pernazza, G; Piccoli, M; Staudacher, C; Vettoretto, N; Zago, M; Lettieri, E; Levati, A; Pietrini, D; Scaglione, M; De Masi, S; De Placido, G; Francucci, M; Rasi, M; Fingerhut, A; Uranus, S; Garattini, S; .
Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Societa Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Societa Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Societa Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), SocietA Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalita Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).
Surg Endosc. 2012; 26(8):2134-2164
Doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2331-3
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-authors Med Uni Graz
-
Uranüs Selman
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- In January 2010, the SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery), under the auspices of the EAES, decided to revisit the clinical recommendations for the role of laparoscopy in abdominal emergencies in adults, with the primary intent being to update the 2006 EAES indications and supplement the existing guidelines on specific diseases. Other Italian surgical societies were invited into the Consensus to form a panel of 12 expert surgeons. In order to get a multidisciplinary panel, other stakeholders involved in abdominal emergencies were invited along with a patient's association. In November 2010, the panel met in Rome to discuss each chapter according to the Delphi method, producing key statements with a grade of recommendations followed by commentary to explain the rationale and the level of evidence behind the statements. Thereafter, the statements were presented to the Annual Congress of the EAES in June 2011. A thorough literature review was necessary to assess whether the recommendations issued in 2006 are still current. In many cases new studies allowed us to better clarify some issues (such as for diverticulitis, small bowel obstruction, pancreatitis, hernias, trauma), to confirm the key role of laparoscopy (such as for cholecystitis, gynecological disorders, nonspecific abdominal pain, appendicitis), but occasionally previous strong recommendations have to be challenged after review of recent research (such as for perforated peptic ulcer). Every surgeon has to develop his or her own approach, taking into account the clinical situation, her/his proficiency (and the experience of the team) with the various techniques, and the specific organizational setting in which she/he is working. This guideline has been developed bearing in mind that every surgeon could use the data reported to support her/his judgment.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
-
Abdomen, Acute - surgery
-
Anesthesia - methods
-
Digestive System Diseases - surgery
-
Emergency Treatment - methods
-
Female -
-
Genital Diseases, Female - surgery
-
Hemodynamics - physiology
-
Humans -
-
Ischemia - surgery
-
Laparoscopy - methods
-
Monitoring, Physiologic -
-
Obesity - complications
-
Patient Selection -
-
Positive-Pressure Respiration -
-
Posture -
-
Pregnancy -
-
Pregnancy Complications - surgery
-
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic -
-
Respiratory Physiological Processes -
-
Vascular Diseases - surgery
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
-
Laparoscopy
-
Acute abdomen
-
Guidelines