Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Buchgraber, B; Kqiku, L; Allmer, N; Jakopic, G; Städtler, P.
Surface roughness of one nanofill and one silorane composite after polishing.
Coll Antropol. 2011; 35(3): 879-883. [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed FullText

 

Leading authors Med Uni Graz
Buchgraber Barbara
Co-authors Med Uni Graz
Kqiku-Biblekaj Lumnije
Staedtler Peter
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to compare the roughness of the surface of one nanofill (Filtek Supreme XT 3M Espe, St. Paul, USA) and one silorane (Filtek Silorane, 3M Espe, St. Paul, USA) composite after polishing. Five specimens of each composite were polymerized under a polyester strip for 40 seconds. After curing four probes were polished with different Sof-Lex discs and one probe with Pogo for ten seconds. For the surface appointment a contact stylus profilometer was used. The profilometer made ten tracings for each sample at different locations. There was a significant difference in roughness between both composites. The Ra (average surface roughness) results for the silorane composite were almost always significantly higher than for the nanofill composite (T-test). For both composites Sof-Lex fine and superfine discs produced smoother final surfaces than Pogo. The nanofill composite used showed the smoothest surfaces after the polishing and finishing procedures.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Composite Resins - chemistry
Dental Polishing -
Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry
Nanocomposites - chemistry
Surface Properties -

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
nanofill composite
silorane composite
surface roughness
profilometer
polishing
© Med Uni GrazImprint