Selected Publication:
SHR
Neuro
Cancer
Cardio
Lipid
Metab
Microb
Buchgraber, B; Kqiku, L; Allmer, N; Jakopic, G; Städtler, P.
Surface roughness of one nanofill and one silorane composite after polishing.
Coll Antropol. 2011; 35(3): 879-883.
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
- Leading authors Med Uni Graz
-
Buchgraber Barbara
- Co-authors Med Uni Graz
-
Kqiku-Biblekaj Lumnije
-
Staedtler Peter
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Abstract:
-
The aim of this study was to compare the roughness of the surface of one nanofill (Filtek Supreme XT 3M Espe, St. Paul, USA) and one silorane (Filtek Silorane, 3M Espe, St. Paul, USA) composite after polishing. Five specimens of each composite were polymerized under a polyester strip for 40 seconds. After curing four probes were polished with different Sof-Lex discs and one probe with Pogo for ten seconds. For the surface appointment a contact stylus profilometer was used. The profilometer made ten tracings for each sample at different locations. There was a significant difference in roughness between both composites. The Ra (average surface roughness) results for the silorane composite were almost always significantly higher than for the nanofill composite (T-test). For both composites Sof-Lex fine and superfine discs produced smoother final surfaces than Pogo. The nanofill composite used showed the smoothest surfaces after the polishing and finishing procedures.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
-
Composite Resins - chemistry
-
Dental Polishing -
-
Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry
-
Nanocomposites - chemistry
-
Surface Properties -
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
-
nanofill composite
-
silorane composite
-
surface roughness
-
profilometer
-
polishing